Timeline for Is it ok to ask about the correctness of preprints on crank-friendly topics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2011 at 23:31 | history | notice removed | KavehMod | ||
| Nov 16, 2011 at 23:30 | history | notice added | KavehMod | Historical significance | |
| Nov 16, 2011 at 23:30 | history | locked | KavehMod | ||
| Mar 29, 2011 at 1:39 | comment | added | Kaveh Mod | but (as the recent case demonstrates) they don't have clear definite answers and will lead to back and forth discussions. | |
| Sep 8, 2010 at 17:16 | comment | added | Charles Stewart | "Correctness of preprints" is going to mean questions of the form: Does so-and-so's purported proof work? These do fit the Q&A format. | |
| Sep 8, 2010 at 4:15 | comment | added | Kaveh | We may end up having one (or even more) post per $P$ vs $NP$ claim that is submitted to arXiv. | |
| Sep 8, 2010 at 4:02 | history | answered | Kaveh | CC BY-SA 2.5 |