9
$\begingroup$

This question The complexity of finding a Borsuk-Ulam point has a paywall link attached with it. Should I edit it to not have a paywall attached with it?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'd say yes if there is a non-paywall alternative. But the link you provided in your edit is not currently working for me. $\endgroup$ – chazisop Aug 8 '15 at 6:34
  • $\begingroup$ @chaziop True, although the link is working for me who is your isp? $\endgroup$ – Joshua Herman Aug 8 '15 at 19:22
  • $\begingroup$ I can access the website at the moment. The error message was that the website was inaccessible due to heavy traffic or being down. $\endgroup$ – chazisop Aug 9 '15 at 22:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So I should post two links instead of one? $\endgroup$ – Joshua Herman Aug 9 '15 at 22:16
  • $\begingroup$ @chaziop It is possible that when I posted the non-paywall link that it took the site down :( $\endgroup$ – Joshua Herman Aug 12 '15 at 14:43
15
$\begingroup$

My view is we should keep the link to the official version (i.e. DOI). To make it more accessible add a link to a copy on arxiv/ECCC/authors' website/... but don't remove the link to official copy. Something like:

or

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .