This question The complexity of finding a Borsuk-Ulam point has a paywall link attached with it. Should I edit it to not have a paywall attached with it?
-
1$\begingroup$ I'd say yes if there is a non-paywall alternative. But the link you provided in your edit is not currently working for me. $\endgroup$– chazisopAug 8, 2015 at 6:34
-
$\begingroup$ @chaziop True, although the link is working for me who is your isp? $\endgroup$– Joshua HermanAug 8, 2015 at 19:22
-
$\begingroup$ I can access the website at the moment. The error message was that the website was inaccessible due to heavy traffic or being down. $\endgroup$– chazisopAug 9, 2015 at 22:15
-
1$\begingroup$ So I should post two links instead of one? $\endgroup$– Joshua HermanAug 9, 2015 at 22:16
-
$\begingroup$ @chaziop It is possible that when I posted the non-paywall link that it took the site down :( $\endgroup$– Joshua HermanAug 12, 2015 at 14:43
1 Answer
My view is we should keep the link to the official version (i.e. DOI). To make it more accessible add a link to a copy on arxiv/ECCC/authors' website/... but don't remove the link to official copy. Something like:
- Leslie Valiant, "A theory of the learnable", 1984. doi:10.1145/1968.1972
or
- Leslie Valiant, "A theory of the learnable", 1984. pdf