I really, really, really hope that the name debate is reopened.
The now-locked, original poll was arguably too close to call. CSTheory.org won by at most one vote if you account for the fourteen negative votes for the comment by Emil (and there were other critical comments which also garnered support). In spite of this, the suggestion of a runoff poll was ignored by the moderator(s).
More importantly, there wasn't really much discussion about how long the name poll/debate was meant to last. So if there is enough support to re-ask or re-open the poll, we should.
The name of the site is of crucial importance and reflects how researchers in our field wish to be portrayed. I believe that as much time, thought and effort should be put into it as necessary.
Another thought is that it is still very early days -- e.g. the Complexity Theory blog just posted a link to the site -- and maybe we could wait a bit longer for more people to get on board before locking in our choice.
Added: I strangely forgot to mention how much I abhor the current choice. It is nearly the least imaginative of the lot and shows how much (or rather, little) creativity we are capable of. I am firmly in the camp "anything but CSTheory.org"!