My understanding is that the home for quantum computing on the arxiv is quant-ph. If that's the case, should we require all quantum-computing questions to be labelled quant-ph in addition to other specific tags that might be appropriate ?
How about coming up with a proposal for the arXiv board to add a new category for quantum computing preprints? I think the quant-ph tag on the arXiv became too broad, it includes too many things and browsing it became too painful. Some universities even started graduate programs in QC, I don't see why the field doesn't deserve an arXiv tag yet.
As a byproduct, we would also solve our problem with tagging QC questions here :)
I do not see anything wrong with creating a tag about quantum information processing. However, as I suggested in an answer to another question, I fail to see why it matters whether some tag has the same name as an arXiv category or not. For example, the tag cc.complexity-theory is useful not because it is the same name as arXiv (it is not even the same name as arXiv, actually), but because it groups questions in complexity theory together.
In short, I do not think that “it is called quant-ph in arXiv” is a valid reason to have that tag.
Since physics arXiv tags don't have two-letter abbreviations, this would confuse everybody who's not familiar with physics on the arXiv. We could add two letters xy.quant-ph (with x and y to be determined). Or we could assume that all quantum computing falls into ds.algorithms or cc.complexity-theory or cr.crypto-security or some other non-quantum tag.