1
$\begingroup$

I am going over old questions which are closed as off-topic.

If you notice a question that is closed as off-topic (based on cstheory's scope at that time) which you think should be reopened (based on cstheory's current scope) please post a link to it below as an answer so we can revisit the decision.

| |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Our scope has changed? $\endgroup$ – Raphael Feb 17 '11 at 8:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Raphael, not recently, but over time yes, e.g. it was not clear at the start that Theory B is inside cstheory scope. Also note that it was much easier to close questions in the private and public beta phases. $\endgroup$ – Kaveh Feb 17 '11 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ I see, thanks for the clarification. $\endgroup$ – Raphael Feb 17 '11 at 20:56
0
$\begingroup$

I took a quick glance over all questions in the list with at least 2 up-votes. Maybe the only question with a positive change to be reopened is this:

Is Witten's new method of quantization useful for geometric complexity theory?

And discussions with controversial opinions are already there in the comments.

Edit: As Kaveh said in the comments, this question is closed as not a real question, not as off-topic. So I don't see any question with at least 2 up-votes need to be revisited. Go for the rest soon.

| |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hsien-Chih Chang, thanks, but it is not closed as off-topic. (Also note that there is another policy against discussions about unpublished work which is not peer-reviewed.) $\endgroup$ – Kaveh Feb 17 '11 at 4:07
  • $\begingroup$ @Kaveh: Maybe I took the glance too quick. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Hsien-Chih Chang 張顯之 Feb 17 '11 at 4:14
  • $\begingroup$ No problem, thanks for checking. :) $\endgroup$ – Kaveh Feb 17 '11 at 4:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .