Skip to main content
Theoretical Computer Science

Return to Answer

replaced http://cstheory.stackexchange.com/ with https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

As this issue recently came up again in regards to this question on matrix multiplicationthis question on matrix multiplication, I thought I'd throw in my two cents.

It seems to me entirely reasonable and in line with all the discussion in this thread that the following type of question be allowed:

This new paper claiming a big result is beyond my ken to read. Before I invest the time to learn all this stuff and try to read it, I am curious: have there been any technical rebuttals or discussions of it?

Note that this avoids issues of credibility, author responses, etc. It is simply a reference request.

(This seems to me essentially what has happened with the matrix multiplication question, and seems like it would satisfy the OP for that question, even though his question wasn't originally phrased this way.)

As this issue recently came up again in regards to this question on matrix multiplication, I thought I'd throw in my two cents.

It seems to me entirely reasonable and in line with all the discussion in this thread that the following type of question be allowed:

This new paper claiming a big result is beyond my ken to read. Before I invest the time to learn all this stuff and try to read it, I am curious: have there been any technical rebuttals or discussions of it?

Note that this avoids issues of credibility, author responses, etc. It is simply a reference request.

(This seems to me essentially what has happened with the matrix multiplication question, and seems like it would satisfy the OP for that question, even though his question wasn't originally phrased this way.)

As this issue recently came up again in regards to this question on matrix multiplication, I thought I'd throw in my two cents.

It seems to me entirely reasonable and in line with all the discussion in this thread that the following type of question be allowed:

This new paper claiming a big result is beyond my ken to read. Before I invest the time to learn all this stuff and try to read it, I am curious: have there been any technical rebuttals or discussions of it?

Note that this avoids issues of credibility, author responses, etc. It is simply a reference request.

(This seems to me essentially what has happened with the matrix multiplication question, and seems like it would satisfy the OP for that question, even though his question wasn't originally phrased this way.)

Notice removed Historical significance by Kaveh
Post Locked by Kaveh
Notice added Historical significance by Kaveh
Source Link
Joshua Grochow
Joshua Grochow
  • 38.5k
  • 16
  • 11

As this issue recently came up again in regards to this question on matrix multiplication, I thought I'd throw in my two cents.

It seems to me entirely reasonable and in line with all the discussion in this thread that the following type of question be allowed:

This new paper claiming a big result is beyond my ken to read. Before I invest the time to learn all this stuff and try to read it, I am curious: have there been any technical rebuttals or discussions of it?

Note that this avoids issues of credibility, author responses, etc. It is simply a reference request.

(This seems to me essentially what has happened with the matrix multiplication question, and seems like it would satisfy the OP for that question, even though his question wasn't originally phrased this way.)