Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with status-completed
Search options not deleted
user 873
Indicates that the report has been resolved through the implementation of a feature or the fixing of a bug.
1
vote
0
answers
89
views
Retag Request: [queuing-theory] --> [queueing-theory]
I'm proposing a retag as: [queuing-theory] --> [queueing-theory]. You can vote for it here:
https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/tags/queueing-theory/synonyms
Quoting from Wikipedia:
The spelling …
- 16.6k
1
vote
5
votes
Is it ok to ask about the correctness of preprints on crank-friendly topics?
I think the same thing happened here: Is the recent proof that P != NP correct?.
When a new result appears, many people try to email "giants" in the community, asking them what is their idea on the p …
- 16.6k