Timeline for Migrate to Meta or not: When should you say what you know?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2010 at 22:19 | comment | added | Lev Reyzin Mod | I have been swayed by these comments to thinking the question should remain open. Too bad I cannot uncast my vote to close... | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 17:55 | comment | added | András Salamon | @Charles: Nice edit. | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 14:23 | comment | added | Charles Stewart | I've leapt in and rephrased the question myself, since (i) the edit is nearly trivial, and (ii) there's an obvious race condition that needs to be fixed. See my revision at cstheory.stackexchange.com/posts/2328/revisions | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 14:16 | comment | added | Robin Kothari | I agree with Jukka. I interpreted the question to mean "on public forums like MO and cstheory." In this case it makes an excellent question. Migrating to meta does, sort of, kill the question. Meta has very few active posters compared to the parent site. | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 14:02 | comment | added | Tsuyoshi Ito | (1) It is true that the question can be a good on-topic question if it is rephrased. I am upset primarily because people who seem to care enough about the subject to answer it are just ignoring what is written in the question without bothering to rephrase or ask the poster to rephrase it. (2) The question as it is is a legitimate meta question. Migrating it to Meta does not “kill” the question. | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 13:56 | comment | added | Aaron Sterling | Please don't close things that are both easy to save and worth saving! <-- this belongs in the FAQ | |
| Oct 21, 2010 at 13:36 | history | answered | Jukka Suomela | CC BY-SA 2.5 |