Timeline for Is "theoretical" computer science too narrow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2017 at 8:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/ with https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 10, 2011 at 21:05 | comment | added | mbq | @Tsuyoshi I absolutely agree; treat this post as a kind of disclaimer for people reading this thread. | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 22:33 | comment | added | Tsuyoshi Ito | Sorry, I still fail to see which part you are referring to. As I understand it, “computational science” means science with the emphasis on computation as a tool. Bioinformatics may count as part of computational science, but are you referring to this? I do not think that it is correct to generalize his list to the vast field of computational science. | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 21:54 | comment | added | mbq | Fifth paragraph... I know that in the end the main proposal is to add ArXiv category only, but ClS was mentioned and such things like to diffuse. | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 21:28 | comment | added | Tsuyoshi Ito | When did Joel propose to merge computational science to TCS SE? | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 19:47 | comment | added | mbq | @Dave Joel is proposing this global merge, I'm opposing. | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 18:20 | comment | added | Dave Clarke Mod | Unless you are proposing to incorporate theoretical computer science with computational science, this has very little to do with the discussion at hand. | |
| Feb 9, 2011 at 18:05 | history | answered | mbq | CC BY-SA 2.5 |