Timeline for Is "theoretical" computer science too narrow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011 at 21:56 | comment | added | Peter Shor | The FCRC isn't really a conference; it's a federated bundle of conferences formed to address the lack of an all-computer science conference. It's a great idea, and quite successful, but as an umbrella venue it just doesn't come close to comparing with the Joint Meetings of the Math Societies, the International Congress of Mathematicians, or the APS March and April meetings. | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 21:28 | comment | added | András Salamon | I think you are overstating the lack of umbrella venues: yes, they are less common. And @Dave, I doubt the ACM would like to think FCRC is total junk. acm.org/fcrc | |
| Feb 12, 2011 at 10:05 | comment | added | Dave Clarke Mod | Actually, there are computer science multi-conferences, a sort of catch all, which are total junk quality-wise. This phenomenon we do not wish to replicate here. | |
| Feb 12, 2011 at 0:35 | history | edited | Peter Shor | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
ICALP is the conference, EATCS the sponsoring association. I should have known this (I did, but ...)
|
| Feb 11, 2011 at 22:38 | history | edited | Peter Shor | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
| Feb 11, 2011 at 22:37 | history | rollback | Peter Shor |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Feb 11, 2011 at 22:37 | history | edited | Peter Shor | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
fixed punctuation
|
| Feb 11, 2011 at 22:02 | history | answered | Peter Shor | CC BY-SA 2.5 |